From: Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn@...>
Date: 2003-03-20T23:37:00+09:00
Subject: Re: Madeleine 0.1

 --- haldane <jbshaldane@hotmail.com> wrote: 

> I wonder in what way are Mnemonic's automatic commands broken?  
> I'd like to know because I am actively using it, and I don't seem to
> have any problems.
> 
> I do find that I need to use my own method wrapper module for objects
> that are contained in my persisted class, so that changes in these
> objects are also persisted.  But it is quite easy to intercept method
> calls to these objects, I just need to include my little module in
> each class.

Hi Haldane,

You kind of answered your own question here. :) With one exception, the
root class of the system, the automatic commands are broken.

> Are you planning to implement some kind of automatic commands?

Yes. There is a nice implementation for Java included as a sample in
the Aspect Oriented Programming project "Nanning", that I intended to
use as the model for Madeleine's design. Of course, in Ruby you can do
things directly in the language that in Java requires tools like AOP.
Lovely language, this.

Could you share your method wrapping code? It seems to be something
like what I intended to write.

/Anders


=====
__________________________________________________
Anders Bengtsson              ndrsbngtssn@yahoo.se
Stockholm, Sweden

_____________________________________________________
G� f�re i k�n och f� din sajt v�rderad p� nolltid med Yahoo! Express
Se mer p�: http://se.docs.yahoo.com/info/express/help/index.html