From: Bruce Williams <bruce@...>
Date: 2003-03-19T13:35:49+09:00
Subject: Re: XML too hard (YAML opportunity?)

This is the YAML advocacy mailbot at host codedbliss.com.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message you submitted 
to ruby-talk did not meet XML frustration standards.  

For further assistance, please send mail to the small
group of YAML supporters within the Ruby community.
If you do so, please include this problem report. 

    The YAML advocacy mailbot

---

(all in good fun)

Now, seriously...

I totally see what you are getting at-- and I agree with the 
'apples-and-oranges' comparison for the most part.

I also recognize that a person's choice of markup formats is mostly matter of 
taste.  Although I've used XML for years, I prefer YAML for the vast majority 
of projects I work on internally (one of which has a $300,000 budget) because 
it is less hassle than XML (using a SAX/DOM parser to turn documents into 
usable data)-- but also simply because I like it.

This, of course, is the same reason why I use Ruby.  If I cared a great deal 
about interoperability (at the current time) I suppose I'd use Perl (esp in 
my work environment).

I love the idea of a common standard-- ie: XML.  At the same time however, I 
don't mind using something else when I feel it's a more elegant approach for 
the project I'm handling.  The fact that YAML is used in very few public 
apps/libs (FreeRide, tomslib) right now doesn't matter to me.  Perhaps this 
is a failing.

// Bruce

-- 
author: Bruce R. Williams 
url: http://codedbliss.com
irc: { nick: iusris, channel: [ruby-lang,yaml], server: irc.freenode.net }
quote: >
  It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
  tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.'
  -- Samuel Adams