From: "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" Date: 2003-03-18T19:25:10+09:00 Subject: Re: Marshal (was Re: Protocols) Hi, > From: Xiangrong Fang > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 10:28 AM > I try to catch up with the conversation here :) Welcome! http://rrr.jin.gr.jp/rwiki?cmd=view;name=Marshal > Does the > benchmark mean > that Ruby 1.8's build-in Marshal routine is the best? Yes, where you can choose it, for example, where no cross language interoperable serialization is needed. But I did not intend to say 1.8 > 1.6 here (even if I think so). Regards, // NaHi