From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2003-02-06T18:23:02+09:00
Subject: Re: %L, %l revisited

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pit Capitain" <pit@capitain.de>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:21 AM
Subject: Re: %L, %l revisited


> On 6 Feb 2003 at 6:44, Hal E. Fulton wrote:
> 
> > (... discussion about %l syntax for here-docs ...)
> > 
> > Besides, it's an issue with the parser and the overall language design,
> > not just with here-docs.
> 
> I don't see why the parser would have problems with the proposed %l 
> syntax. 

I didn't mean the parser would have problems of 
that nature. I meant the parser would have to
undergo radical changes and here-docs as we
know them would be broken.

Hal