From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@...>
Date: 2003-02-06T08:24:30+09:00
Subject: Re: Thank you all and new questions

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 01:42:21 +0900, Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@math.umd.edu> pisze:

> I like Ruby's object orientation better.  Python is not 100% OO,
> but more of a hybrid.  For instance, there are both functions and
> methods, and they are different.  In Ruby, there are only methods.

Well, also procs and blocks...

> However, you can define a method that is just a method of the class
> Object (at the top of Ruby's hierarchy).  Those can be used just
> like a function, and you can call them functions.

Except they all land in a single namespace. Python functions sit in
their modules.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/