From: Alan Chen Date: 2003-01-28T14:38:58+09:00 Subject: Re: Test::Unit -> order of tests? It occurs to me that you might to support unordered tests by providing a "random" test sequence method. On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:56:02AM +0900, Nathaniel Talbott wrote: > I hate the fact that test ordering is ever important. I hope that people > only ever use different test orderings in order to identify test > interdependency as a step to removing it. But I recognize that there are > various reasons (a few of them even pragmatic ;-) that will cause > ordering to matter for some tests. >...snip -- Alan Chen Digikata Computing http://digikata.com