From: ahoward <ahoward@...>
Date: 2003-01-28T02:57:54+09:00
Subject: Re: Test::Unit -> order of tests?

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Michael Garriss wrote:

> IMHO, it would be nice if they were run in the order they were defined.

agreed.

>
> -mike
>
> ahoward wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Mauricio Fern�ndez wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>I'm new to Unit Testing and wanted to learn on it by writing the tests for a
> >>cheap file-transfer protocol. There's some hand-shaking involved at the
> >>beginning which _needs_ to be done before anything else. The problem is I'd
> >>like to test that too, but I don't know if I can rely on any order in the
> >>execution of the tests. OTOH, I don't know if it's OK to do everything in
> >>#setup and do the assertions right there.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >i had a similar problem.  nameing your tests in a manner which sorts lexically
> >seems to work, eg :
> >
> >  def test_a_whatever
> >    ...
> >  end
> >
> >  def test_b_whatever
> >    ...
> >  end
> >
> >-a
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

-- 

 ====================================
 | Ara Howard
 | NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory
 | Information and Technology Services
 | Data Systems Group
 | R/FST 325 Broadway
 | Boulder, CO 80305-3328
 | Email: ahoward@fsl.noaa.gov
 | Phone:  303-497-7238
 | Fax:    303-497-7259
 ====================================