From: Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>
Date: 2003-01-24T08:39:00+09:00
Subject: Scientific library [ was Re: Missing libraries??]

On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:43:12PM +0900, ahoward wrote:

> 28. Scientific Library (like python has)

What do people think of just wrapping the GNU Scientific Library?

So Scientific::zeta() would wrap gsl_sf_zeta_int()  or would
Scientific::GSL::zeta() be better?  I think that this is getting a little 
verbose.

Then we can start adding other stuff that might not be included in the 
GSL.  Like an interface to PGPLOT.

Note: The GSL is GPL, not LGPL.  I am cool with that, but I felt I should 
mention it.

Cheers

-- 
Daniel Carrera
Graduate Teaching Assistant.  Math Dept.
University of Maryland.  (301) 405-5137