From: nobu.nokada@... Date: 2003-01-24T01:36:52+09:00 Subject: Re: Test Issue with win32_popen was [ANN] win32_popen 0.1 Hi, At Fri, 24 Jan 2003 01:24:33 +0900, Berger, Daniel wrote: > I think it should be YYYYY. That way we're y10k compliant. No point > putting it off. Look where that got us last time! You ran into Y100k, Y1M and Y10**30 problems now, refer RFC2550. -- Nobu Nakada