From: "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>
Date: 2003-01-24T01:24:33+09:00
Subject: Re: Test Issue with win32_popen was [ANN] win32_popen 0.1



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert McGovern [mailto:robertm@spellmanhv.co.uk] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:22 AM
> To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: Test Issue with win32_popen was [ANN] win32_popen 0.1
> 
> 
> > Surely YYYY-MM-DD is the only intelligent date format.  No 
> confusion 
> > whatsoever.  Since the Y2K fiasco, I've never seen any advantage in 
> > abbreviating the year, even in informal writing.
> 
> Agreed, I always use YYYY-MM-DD now and will always write the 
> year out 
> as YYYY on both formal & informal documents.
> 
> I'm working on the principle that if enough of us do it there 
> won't be a 
> problem again in 97 years.
> 
> Rob
> 

I think it should be YYYYY.  That way we're y10k compliant.  No point
putting it off.  Look where that got us last time!

:-P

Ok, back to work.

Dan