From: Tom Sawyer <transami@...>
Date: 2003-01-23T11:14:08+09:00
Subject: Re: Hash#+ ?

On Wednesday 22 January 2003 06:52 pm, dblack@candle.superlink.net wrote:
>   No information lost by String#+ or Array#+, but Hash#update may lose
>   the value.  That's why I rejected the name "+".  It is possible to
>   provide the non destructive "update" under different name.  Good
>   name?

David, what value can be lost? i don't understand.

-- 
tom sawyer, aka transami
transami@transami.net


                                   .''.
       .''.      .        *''*    :_\/_:     .
      :_\/_:   _\(/_  .:.*_\/_*   : /\ :  .'.:.'.
  .''.: /\ :   ./)\   ':'* /\ * :  '..'.  -=:o:=-
 :_\/_:'.:::.  | ' *''*    * '.\'/.' _\(/_'.':'.'
 : /\ : :::::  =  *_\/_*     -= o =-  /)\    '  *
  '..'  ':::' === * /\ *     .'/.\'.   '._____
      *        |   *..*         :       |.   |' .---"|
        *      |     _           .--'|  ||   | _|    |
        *      |  .-'|       __  |   |  |    ||      |
     .-----.   |  |' |  ||  |  | |   |  |    ||      |
 ___'       ' /"\ |  '-."".    '-'   '-.'    '`      |_.
------------------------------------------------------------