From: Daniel Carrera Date: 2003-01-11T07:45:20+09:00 Subject: Re: dot-equals method? > The . has a somewhat different status than + or *, though. > > x += 1 == x = x.+ 1 > x *= 1 == x = x.* 1 > > x .= split ?= x = x.. split Why can't we say: x += 2 == x = x + 2 x *= 2 == x = x + 2 x .= foo == x = x . foo I don't see the extra collapsing syntax (yes I realize that '.' is different from '+', but syntatically they are used the same). Daniel Carrera Graduate Teaching Assistant. Math Dept. University of Maryland. (301) 405-5137