From: Martin Hart Date: 2003-01-11T01:26:44+09:00 Subject: Re: Test::Unit fails w/no tests [was: testunit 0.1.6 problems] On 1/10/03, 3:51:57 PM, wrote regarding Re: Test::Unit fails w/no tests [was: testunit 0.1.6 problems]: > Gavin Sinclair [mailto:gsinclair@soyabean.com.au] wrote: > > But it's distracting you from real failures as well. > Only if it's not a real failure itself. My plan now is to implement it > in terms of a regular assertion, so that it is, indeed, a real boy, er, > failure :-) Excuse me for butting in late on in the thread, this may not be of any relevance/importance, but have you considered "feature" compatability with other versions of xUnit? While it is a minor point, I do wonder if Test::Unit should behave the same way as all the other tools based on xUnit? Either way - it's a great module and I'm not going to stop using it if this feature stays in :-) Cheers, Martin -- Martin Hart Tel: +44 (0) 1582 618468 Arnclan Fax: +44 (0) 1582 619596 Union Street, E-mail: martin@zsdfherg.com Dunstable, Beds LU6 1EX