From: dblack@...
Date: 2003-01-09T23:49:50+09:00
Subject: Re: Test::Unit fails w/no tests [was: testunit 0.1.6 problems]

Hi --

On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 nathaniel@NOSPAMtalbott.ws wrote:

> Gavin Sinclair [mailto:gsinclair@soyabean.com.au] wrote:
>
> > A failure, in a test unit sense, means strictly (to me) that
> > an assertion has failed, and an error means strictly that an
> > uncaught exception was detected.
>
> In general I agree, although I'm trying to figure out how important the
> 'strictly' part is. I guess you could think of this failure as just the
> default test in TestCase; if there are no other tests, a default test is
> run that always fails.

Could there be a way to hook or override the default test, so that one
could relatively easily change the behavior?


David

-- 
David Alan Black
home: dblack@candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web:  http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav