From: Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...>
Date: 2003-01-09T16:24:00+09:00
Subject: Re: String#unpack and big-endian versus little-endian

On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:51, Berger, Daniel wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Harry Ohlsen [mailto:harryo@zip.com.au]
> >
> > I ended up with code like ...
> >
> >    byte[0], byte[1], byte[2], byte[3] =
> >        byte[3], byte[2], byte[1], byte[0]
> >
> > I can't help but wonder whether there's a cleverer way to do
> > this.
>
> Unless I've missed something, what about byte.reverse!

Yes, there's another "working on 3 hours' sleep" problem :-) !!