From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-01-09T09:17:44+09:00
Subject: Re: Test::Unit fails w/no tests [was: testunit 0.1.6 problems]

Hi,

In message "Re: Test::Unit fails w/no tests [was: testunit 0.1.6 problems]"
    on 03/01/09, nathaniel@NOSPAMtalbott.ws <nathaniel@NOSPAMtalbott.ws> writes:

|In general I agree, although I'm trying to figure out how important the
|'strictly' part is. I guess you could think of this failure as just the
|default test in TestCase; if there are no other tests, a default test is
|run that always fails.

It's not good for my mental health, since "rubicon" has many empty
test cases for unknown reason.

							matz.