From: "Berger, Daniel" Date: 2003-01-09T05:51:51+09:00 Subject: Re: String#unpack and big-endian versus little-endian > -----Original Message----- > From: Harry Ohlsen [mailto:harryo@zip.com.au] > > I ended up with code like ... > > byte[0], byte[1], byte[2], byte[3] = > byte[3], byte[2], byte[1], byte[0] > > I can't help but wonder whether there's a cleverer way to do > this. Unless I've missed something, what about byte.reverse! Regards, Dan