From: Tom Sawyer <transami@...>
Date: 2003-01-08T10:43:39+09:00
Subject: Re: $cgi = CGI.new w/ mod_ruby dangerous or acceptable?

On Tuesday 07 January 2003 06:24 pm, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> Singleton pattern

ah yes, that clears it up a bit. that would work fine if... my fear is one of 
multiple users accessing my app and winding up with one anothers cgi 
instance, so there's where i have been unclear: each user will receive there 
own space. yes? no sharing globals or class variables (@@s) between them? i 
imagine that must be the case, though i do not know how mod_ruby handles this 
(based on requesting ip?) yet still persisting these for a single user. 
anyway i just want to be sure that implemenating a Singleton pattern for cgi 
will not cause any unforseen problems.

thanks Gavin,

tom sawyer, aka transami
transami@transami.net


                                   .''.
       .''.      .        *''*    :_\/_:     .
      :_\/_:   _\(/_  .:.*_\/_*   : /\ :  .'.:.'.
  .''.: /\ :   ./)\   ':'* /\ * :  '..'.  -=:o:=-
 :_\/_:'.:::.  | ' *''*    * '.\'/.' _\(/_'.':'.'
 : /\ : :::::  =  *_\/_*     -= o =-  /)\    '  *
  '..'  ':::' === * /\ *     .'/.\'.   '._____
      *        |   *..*         :       |.   |' .---"|
        *      |     _           .--'|  ||   | _|    |
        *      |  .-'|       __  |   |  |    ||      |
     .-----.   |  |' |  ||  |  | |   |  |    ||      |
 ___'       ' /"\ |  '-."".    '-'   '-.'    '`      |_.
------------------------------------------------------------