From: "Daniel P. Zepeda" <daniel@...>
Date: 2003-01-04T04:40:49+09:00
Subject: Re: CGI Lib

On Sat, 4 Jan 2003 01:13:45 +0900
dwerder@gmx.net (Dominik Werder) wrote:

> > are you talking about the cgi.html { cgi.head { ... } + cgi.body { ...
> > }  } stuff?
> > > > btw, am I the only one who feels that this funny html support
> > > > doesn't belongs to a cgi lib?!?
> > > Just out of curiosity, what funny html support?
> > > I haven't played with Ruby/CGI much.
> 
> yes, I'm talking about these many nested code blocks...
> 
> Can anyone teach me the advantages of this kind of design?
> And why does every html tag needs an own method?

I found no real advantage, in fact, it is a real pain in the butt. Several
months back I posted some suggestions on http://rubycookbook.org on how to
use these (some) of these tags in a painless fashion, allowing embedded
code and such. Look it up there in the web section.


> 
> thx!
> Dominik


-- 
"Daniel P. Zepeda" <daniel@z,e,p,e,d,a,-,z,o,n,e.net>
(Remove commas for address)