From: Matthias Veit <matthias_veit@...>
Date: 2003-01-03T02:20:33+09:00
Subject: Re: Compatibility (was Class.inherited)


>>>> YM == matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

YM> By the way, back to the original issue; after examining the change
YM>  history, I found out *that change was wrong*.  I will back it up to
YM>  the original 1.6 "inherited" behavior.

... that would be great!

For the sake of flexibility I would appreciate two hooks: after declaration and
after definition of a subclass. Perhaps such a behaviour is useful for all other
hooks too (before and after a module is included, before and after a method is
defined ...).

To the availability of hooks:
An additional trigger might be the definition of a nested module/class inside a
module/class. This is a feature I am missing.

Best regards,
Matthias

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com