From: "Mauricio Fernández" Date: 2002-12-18T18:11:54+09:00 Subject: Re: OT: Functional Language Recommendation On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:49:13PM +0900, Shashank Date wrote: > > wrote in message > > It's not exactly an endorsement; "Language of the Year" isn't an award > > or anything like that, it's just a language-learning initiative. > > Ok, may be "endorse" is not the right term to use. I meant to say > "suggested", "recommended" or something to that effect. But, yes, I was > assuming a little more that just "hosting the project" ;-) > > > The reason Haskell was chosen is that the people who started up the > > "Language of the Year" project (me and Chad Fowler) wanted to learn > > Haskell :-) > > So again, why Haskell ? What was (is??) the lure ? Even Matz seemed to > endo..., sorry, like (?) the idea.(ruby-talk: 47758). Or was he just > referring to your project on PragProg ? > > Also, are you guys thinking of LOTY for 2003 ? Just curious ... > Japanese is always a very strong candidate. -- _ _ | |__ __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___ __ _ _ __ | '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ | |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | | |_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_| Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable) batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com No, that's wrong too. Now there's a race condition between the rm and the mv. Hmm, I need more coffee. -- Guy Maor on Debian Bug#25228