From: Jason Persampieri <jason@...>
Date: 2002-12-17T10:09:51+09:00
Subject: Re: More FXRuby oddness : subclassed FXTreeItem

Ahhh... always one step ahead of me, aren't ya?

Here's a test case

require 'fox'
include Fox

class MyTreeItem < FXTreeItem
end

class MyMainWindow < FXMainWindow
  def initialize(app)
    super(app, "Era - The Kush Build System", nil,
nil, DECOR_ALL, 0, 0, 200, 200)
    tree = FXTreeList.new(self, 0, nil, 0,
LAYOUT_FILL_X|LAYOUT_FILL_Y)
    tree.addItemLast(nil, MyTreeItem.new("NewItem"))
    tree.connect(SEL_COMMAND) {|sender, sel, item|
puts item.class.to_s}
  end
end

theApp = FXApp.new
theApp.init(ARGV)

myWindow = MyMainWindow.new(theApp)
theApp.create
myWindow.show(PLACEMENT_SCREEN)
theApp.run


--- Lyle Johnson <lyle@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Jason Persampieri wrote:
> 
> > I have subclassed FXTreeItem (MyTreeItem) and
> built a
> > tree out of it.  That works fine.
> > 
> > However, when 'connecting' a SEL_COMMAND sent to
> the
> > tree to a method, the item that is sent is an
> > FXTreeItem, and not a MyTreeItem.  Is this the
> > intended behaviour?
> 
> No, you should get a reference to the original
> MyTreeItem object(s). 
> This *sounds* like a bug that has already been fixed
> for the (pending) 
> FXRuby-1.0.17 release; if you want to send me a test
> case to 
> double-check, I'd be glad to confirm that it's doing
> the right thing 
> before the official 1.0.17 release.
> 
>