From: Trevor.Jenkins@... (Trevor Jenkins) Date: 2002-12-16T19:41:17+09:00 Subject: Re: Toward ruby-lang.org renewal; trial website offered On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:02:01 +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" > To: "ruby-talk ML" > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 3:52 AM > Subject: Re: Toward ruby-lang.org renewal; trial website offered > > > > Hi, all, > > > > > From: Tim Bates [mailto:tim@bates.id.au] > > > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:48 PM > > > > > > Horrible! Those with colour deficient sight will have > > > > difficultly with all > > > > that red. Someone needs to do a little web search > > > > on colour usage. > > > > Definitely. We meant no harm. We had to realize about it. > > > > > http://www.vischeck.com/vischeck/ > > > > Thank you all. I'll check it. > > This is just my opinion. > > I see no need to choose colors based on readability > by such a small percentage of the population. "8% of men and 0.5 percent of women have some form of color blindness. For some Web sites that could translate to 1 in 12 visitors." http://webtechniques.com/archives/2000/08/newman/ Which means that up to the time of this reply at least one of the contributors to this thread probably has some form of colour blindness. Now such a small percentage when you can name them. Regards, Trevor British Sign Language is not inarticulate handwaving; it's a living language. Support the campaign for formal recognition by the British government now! Details at http://www.fdp.org.uk/ -- <>< Re: deemed!