From: Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>
Date: 2002-12-01T06:05:19+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby ++, the one element and generators

> In the above I was a bit loose on the semantics of a++ vs. ++a. These
> semantics should be well known

Yes they are, but I doubt that Matz would like a '++a'.  It really doesn't
fit with the OO model at all.  Even 'a++' is pushing it.  I think that's
why Matz didn't include a '++'.

Daniel.