From: MikkelFJ <mikkelfj-anti-spam@...>
Date: 2002-11-16T06:03:49+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby.NET ??


"Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:ar1srm$egbvp$1@ID-167200.news.dfncis.de...
> All that's why I say there is a way to bridge from Ruby to .NET. But Ruby
> cannot be integrated to .NET tightly. One cannot compile Ruby into IL,
Ruby
> class cannot be a .NET class, and Ruby object cannot be a .NET object.
They
> could have some kind of proxies, not more.

You can compile Ruby into IL but the objects will just be objects. The main
difference between this and interop is that there would be no separate
interpreter with separate memory management.

Mikkel