From: Bruce Williams Date: 2002-11-10T11:11:51+09:00 Subject: Re: An alternative HTML generation syntax On Saturday 09 November 2002 05:07 pm, Tom Clarke wrote: > I was considering using file extensions as a way of differentiating > between different types of templates, as opposed to specifically > instantiating something. > > What do you think? > > -Tom I suppose that would be a good approach-- and I guess you could handle inline templates specifically. It should be pretty easy to write, just requiring amrita/template and using either Amrita::TemplateFile or Amrita::TemplateText. Of course, this is just supposition on my part... Being able to use Amrita from NARF "out of the box" would definitely be something I'd be interested in doing, since I plan on using both anyway. :) Let me know if you want anyone to test/plug away away at it. Thanks- -- Bruce Williams