From: "Mauricio Fernández" <batsman.geo@...>
Date: 2002-11-09T05:31:37+09:00
Subject: Re: bRuby? (Yet another Ruby parser)

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:45:37PM +0900, Mark Probert wrote:
> 
> At 12:04 PM 11/8/2002 +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote:
> >Maybe, Mark's parser for cocorb don't reuse production rules parse.y 
> >because
> >the rules are not LL(1).
> 
> It doesn't use parse.y, rather it is an attempt to see if
> I can define ruby in LL(1).  I am beginning to think that
> it is not possible due to the ambiguities.  I still have
> a few things to try before I give up ... :-)

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/51715

-- 
 _           _                             
| |__   __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___   __ _ _ __  
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \ 
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
	Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

Linux: Where Don't We Want To Go Today?
	-- Submitted by Pancrazio De Mauro, paraphrasing some well-known sales talk