From: Charles Blackburn Date: 2002-11-03T11:47:58+09:00 Subject: [Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender] hi all i got this from an smtp server i have never heard of, I am assuming that my original message has appeared in the list because it came back to me thru the list. I have seena recent mesage on bugtraq/incidents@securityfocus.com email list, and have forwarded this there too. does any1 have any ideas on what's happened. in the mean time I have blocked that domain. regards charles -----Forwarded Message----- > From: Mail Delivery System > To: charlesb@summerfield-technology.co.uk > Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender > Date: 03 Nov 2002 00:25:27 +0000 > > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim). > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: > > pipe to |/usr/bin/procmail > generated by ibraheem@localhost > > The following text was generated during the delivery attempt: > > ------ pipe to |/usr/bin/procmail > generated by ibraheem@localhost ------ > > procmail: Extraneous locallockfile ignored > > ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ > > Return-path: > Received: from localhost.localdomain > ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=[vdURLRU3e9IFTDeJrdOYiv3EqAqabetD]) > by ignoramus with esmtp (Exim 4.10) > id 1888Zy-0004er-00 > for ibraheem@localhost; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:25:26 +0000 > Received: from mail.btinternet.com [194.73.73.90] > by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) > for ibraheem@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:25:26 +0000 (GMT) > Received: from helium.ruby-lang.org ([210.251.121.214]) > by aluminium with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #12) > id 1888Ze-0007Oi-00; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:25:09 +0000 > Received: from helium.ruby-lang.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by helium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP > id 482A916; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 09:25:02 +0900 (JST) > Received: from kilo.rb.xcalibre.co.uk (unknown [217.204.38.22]) > by helium.ruby-lang.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEC411 > for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 09:24:49 +0900 (JST) > Received: from [194.222.98.175] (helo=enterprise.summerfield-technology.co.uk) > by kilo.rb.xcalibre.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #3) > id 1888Z7-00039A-00 > for ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:24:34 +0000 > Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 09:24:59 +0900 > Posted: 03 Nov 2002 00:24:26 +0000 > From: Charles Blackburn > Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org > Subject: Re: Ruby Hosting > To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML) > Message-Id: <1036279560.12417.21.camel@enterprise> > In-Reply-To: <20021102175759.12851.00002074@mb-fk.aol.com> > References: > <20021102175759.12851.00002074@mb-fk.aol.com> > X-ML-Name: ruby-talk > X-Mail-Count: 54708 > X-MLServer: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)]; post only (anyone can post) > X-ML-Info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body > "help" (without quotes) to the address ruby-talk-ctl@ruby-lang.org; > help= > X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7 > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,RCVD_IN_ORBZ version=2.20 > X-Spam-Level: > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Precedence: bulk > Lines: 11 > List-Id: ruby-talk.ruby-lang.org > List-Software: fml [fml 4.0.3 release (20011202/4.0.3)] > List-Post: > List-Owner: > List-Help: > List-Unsubscribe: > > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 23:17, loats205 wrote: > > ruby occupies more than one proccess? im looking for sugestions, so feel free > > to suggest how it could be livable, im just taking the poll, not administrating > > the host. > > > > > well i know it's a stupid thought, but surely the login process takes upon at > least two processes just to get to a shell :P > > charles > > >