From: martindemello@... (Martin DeMello)
Date: 2002-10-26T07:05:47+09:00
Subject: Re: How come true, false don't support <=> (comparison) operator?

cilibrar@ugcs.caltech.edu (Rudi Cilibrasi) wrote in message 
 
> Would anything break if this were made a part of the standard package?
> In thinking about possibilities for future versions of Ruby, perhaps
> it would make sense to have TrueClass and FalseClass both derive
> from a common base class, say, BooleanClass.

I'm not sure about supporting a default ordering on booleans (as David
said, there's no real reason to have true > false), but having them
both descend from a common base class sounds like a nice idea.

martin