From: William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@...>
Date: 2002-10-23T00:57:18+09:00
Subject: Re: rb_gc_register_address problem

Uuups, sorry, reading too fast; in C the precedence is rather different:

    rb_gc_mark(*list->varptr);    /* '->' is stronger than '*' */

So in fact, at the end Matz is giving back *(&VALUE), which is the same as
VALUE.  So forget about the O(N**2) process.  It seems that you (Paul) are
correct, that we can have either VALUE or VALUE*.  And based on your
example (I don't know about other cases) it seems that
rb_gc_register_address is better off using VALUE instead of VALUE*.

Using VALUE, this is still valid:

     a = Qnil;
     rb_gc_register_address(a);
     rb_gc_unregister_address(a);    /* optional */
     a = rb_ary_new();
     rb_gc_register_address(a);

Using VALUE*, on the other hand, we just save some typing:

     a = Qnil;
     rb_gc_register_address(&a);
     a = rb_ary_new();
     /* no need for another rb_gc_register_address (&a) here */

Regards,

Bill