From: William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@...>
Date: 2002-10-23T00:17:09+09:00
Subject: Re: rb_gc_register_address problem

Well, as long as after each new object creation we call
rb_gc_register_address() (and optionally call rb_gc_unregister_address()),
this is fine:

     a = Qnil;
     rb_gc_register_address(a);
     rb_gc_unregister_address(a);    /* optional */
     a = rb_ary_new();
     rb_gc_register_address(a);

Of course, we are here assuming rb_gc_register_address(VALUE) instead of
rb_gc_register_address(VALUE*) and Matz has to do the O(N**2) process in
rb_gc().

Bill
===========================================================================
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
>     a = Qnil;
>     rb_gc_register_address(a);
>     a = rb_ary_new();


> Guy Decoux