From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2002-10-14T06:18:28+09:00
Subject: Re: Sorting

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <dblack@candle.superlink.net>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Sorting


> No one has claimed it did.  In any case, I'm not sold on the "already
> copied a lot" argument....  I think the real question is whether or
> not "Comprehensive Ruby Archive Network" is a good name for raa.succ.
> It doesn't do much for me personally, even leaving aside the
> shadow-of-Perl issue.

I have always favored the name "Ruby Archive" -- it's concise, easy
to pronounce (as is the abbr. "RA"). It's derivative of our current
RAA, yet more accurate, as not everything in the RAA is an application
(nor perhaps even half).

Hal