From: Albert Wagner Date: 2002-10-10T09:02:26+09:00 Subject: Re: Polymorphism, Isomorphism On Wednesday 09 October 2002 8:12 pm, Phil Tomson wrote: > Does the term Isomorphism work here? It seems that it might provide us > with a distinction from Polymorphism (which people coming from a C++/Java > world see as being distinctly related to inheritance). I wouldn't surrender the term Polymorphism to a newer and more limited definition. But then I'm an old Smalltalker. > > Also, what about this idea of set operations on Classes (where we look at > classes and modules as sets of methods)? Would it buy us anything? I don't really think so. I would prefer that those new to pure OOP languages discard/enlarge their thinking and realize that neither C++ nor Java are pure OOP. > > ....just thinking 'out loud'. > Phil -- Best essay I've read in years: http://www.spack.org/words/commandline.html