From: Jim Freeze <jim@...>
Date: 2002-10-02T09:02:37+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-talk separation, part II

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 05:48:25AM +0900, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > As I ponder over the list of topics below, I wonder if people would
> > be interested in distributing the load of RWN?  if each mailing list
> > had 1-3 'correspondents', a much more detailed RWN could be
> > cooperatively produced ... any thoughts?
> 
> I'd be down for doing that on the lists that I had a key interest in.
> Would there be any interest in having me toss out a small scheduling
> app that'd help ensure that there was someone on duty for each list?
> I know there are times that I go dark and would need to pass the hat
> to the next person in line. -sc
> 

I think I would just rather have the digest option for each list.

> -- 
> Sean Chittenden

-- 
Jim Freeze
----------
Programming Ruby 
 def initialize; fun; end
A language with class