From: Pat Eyler <pate@...>
Date: 2002-10-02T05:51:20+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-talk separation, part II



On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Sean Chittenden wrote:

> > As I ponder over the list of topics below, I wonder if people would
> > be interested in distributing the load of RWN?  if each mailing list
> > had 1-3 'correspondents', a much more detailed RWN could be
> > cooperatively produced ... any thoughts?
> 
> I'd be down for doing that on the lists that I had a key interest in.
> Would there be any interest in having me toss out a small scheduling
> app that'd help ensure that there was someone on duty for each list?
> I know there are times that I go dark and would need to pass the hat
> to the next person in line. -sc

scheduling would be one part.  collecting, verifying, collating, and
forwarding the XML to the processor (or processing it locally) would be
the second (and bigger) bit.


Of course, it would all hinge on a) the current RWN crew buying in, and
b) finding enough people to step up to the plate.


-pate

> 
> -- 
> Sean Chittenden
>