From: Sean Chittenden <sean@...>
Date: 2002-10-02T05:18:33+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-talk separation, part II

> > PS If in one weeks time I haven't heard of any objections, I will
> > wholesale create all of these lists above plus any other suggested
> > lists and toss them on rubynet.org along with an updated site and
> > links pointing to all of the lists, descriptions of the lists, and
> > archives.  Searchable archives I'll be able to have up in a week
> > or so after that.
> 
> I believe there is already a question of whether such lists should
> be hosted by ruby-lang.org.  I would suggest that broad-topic lists
> remain under the auspices of the ruby-lang.org umbrella, while
> independent lists be reserved for application-specific topics (e.g.,
> the DRuby or REXML lists).

Having the lists, regardless of where they are, is more important than
not having the lists.  Transfering the domains/lists/subscribers is
easy, building the communties and diversifying the traffic is what's
important.  Getting the proof of concenpt done is important since
there seems to be some doubt as to its need.  -sc

-- 
Sean Chittenden