From: Jim Freeze Date: 2002-10-01T21:24:59+09:00 Subject: Re: ruby-talk separation, part II On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:03:44PM +0900, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > > i think that creating of maillist named ruby-chat or ruby.beyond is > not the best way to separate traffic. noone thinks that his interests > is "beyond" of ruby or he just chatting and stole time of another > subscribers > > my personal interests is > 1) improvement of language by implementing common usage patterns in > ruby itself > 2) changes to language desirable to work on large projects > 3) language design principles - area where i and Pixel (and Matz?) can > answer to your questions > > as interest to ruby grows, this maillist grows too. may be it's time > to send ruby progress group to separate maillist > > -- > Best regards, > Bulat mailto:bulatz@integ.ru > > Here are just a few suggestions of mail lists (Most of these are not original, but come from other groups I have seen, eg, FreeBSD) cvs-all Changes made to the source tree ruby-advocacy Ruby Evangelism ruby-announce Important events and project milestones ruby-arch Architecture and design discussions ruby-bugs Bug reports ruby-chat Non-technical items related to the Ruby community ruby-config Development of Ruby installation and configuration tools ruby-core Discussion concerning RCR's and patches for Ruby ruby-docs Discussion concerning Ruby and library documentation ruby-jobs Ruby employment and consulting opportunities ruby-newbies New Ruby users activities and discussions ruby-questions User questions and technical support ruby-security Security issues ruby-test Where to send your test messages instead of one of the actual lists ruby-www Issues for using Ruby with http servers -- Jim Freeze ---------- Programming Ruby def initialize; fun; end A language with class