From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2002-10-01T21:15:48+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-talk separation, part II

Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> writes:

> > What, specifically, is wrong? Listing items on RAA?  Using RAA as a
> > central point of information about contributed libraries?  Expecting
> > people to actively check the RAA for changes?
> 
> Expecting people to goto the RAA.  (ps, sorry for being harsh/brash)

RubyGarden also publishes an RDF feed of RAA changes.

    http://www.rubygarden.org/ruby?RichSiteSummary

If we need an -announce list, I'd much rather see an official one
(that is, one that originates from ruby-lang.org). I think that would
stand far more chance of being accepted and adopted. It also gives us
a consistent archive and search mechanism.


Dave