From: Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Date: 2002-10-01T09:16:40+09:00
Subject: Re: true.not

From: "MikkelFJ" <mikkelfj-anti-spam@bigfoot.com>

> Why is the following not valid:
> (some boolean expression).not
> true.not
>
> Mikkel

It doesn't appeal to me, and I see no need for it to be included as OO purism.
If such were required, I think (True|False)Class.inverse would fit the bill,
but I don't see it soving any problems.

Gavin