From: William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@...>
Date: 2002-10-01T00:16:58+09:00
Subject: Re: true.not

Hi Mikkel,

I think it is simply because "not" is not a method, but instead a pure
operator.  (For example, see Table 18.4 in the Pickaxe book).

(Well, although Ruby is pure OO, it still has both methods and operators.)

Regards,

Bill
==========================================================================
MikkelFJ <mikkelfj-anti-spam@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> Why is the following not valid:
> (some boolean expression).not
> true.not

> Mikkel