From: Mark Probert <probertm@...>
Date: 2002-09-27T22:09:49+09:00
Subject: Re: Is Ruby's grammar LL(k)?


Hi, Nobu.

>Perhaps, it really wants LALR(k) or possibly LL(k), where k is
>3 or more.

Is this due to the use of yield and blocks?  Or do you think
that there are other parts that won't be accessible to LL(1)?



-mark.