From: Rich Kilmer <rich@...>
Date: 2002-09-20T04:01:14+09:00
Subject: RE: visual ruby

They did do this well over a year ago...I don't think ActiveRuby or
Visual Ruby is on their roadmap...or it was not earlier this year when I
talked to their CEO.  They did not (yet) see Ruby as a viable market for
a (pay for) product.

-rich

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Tomson [mailto:ptkwt@shell1.aracnet.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:41 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: Re: visual ruby
> 
> 
> In article 
> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0209191803420.16536-100000@mlabdial.hit.bme.hu>,
> Kontra, Gergely <kgergely@mlabdial.hit.bme.hu> wrote:
> >I just want to find the Visual Ruby project, and find this page:
> >
> >http://www.activestate.com/Corporate/Copyright.html
> >
> >That's why this project called VisualuRuby or sg. like that?
> >
> 
> Hmmmm... I also see that they've trademarked ActiveRuby.
> 
> I'm not sure I'd read too much into this yet...  They might 
> have done this 
> a while ago.  At one time they were considering supporting Ruby.
> 
> Phil
> 
>