From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2002-09-10T09:17:36+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby aesthetics

Hi,

In message "Re: Ruby aesthetics"
    on 02/09/10, William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@z.glue.umd.edu> writes:

|That's why I drew an "analogy" and not a pure comparison.  C is minimalist
|in terms of concepts, not really true in the verbosity/keywords 
|area.

Ruby is logically very simple, it has only one (main) component:
object.  It is even simpler than Python, which has class instance and
other object.

|    short code + consistency = easy maintainability

Agreed.  And I feel like "consistency" in this equation due more to
minimalism of concept.

							matz.