From: Austin Ziegler Date: 2002-09-09T15:02:06+09:00 Subject: Re: JRuby (was Re: OS-independent build of ruby) On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 03:49:27 +0900, Jan Arne Petersen wrote: > You don't read the mails Austin wrote to me. But there is a big > difference if you start a conversation with a request for another > license (because you want to use JRuby in a commercial > application) or with the unfounded reproach of copyright > violation. Mr Petersen: At no time in my emails here or to you directly have I suggested that there is a copyright violation. In my first email asking you the question, I said: "[Because JRuby is likely implemented from the C version because there is no language specification document,] wouldn't it be, then, that JRuby would have to be under the same licence or licences as Ruby itself, to wit [...] "I'm quite curious about this, as it seems improper for you to choose only one of the two licences in which Ruby is available." This asked a question. My statement of "improper" has nothing to do with what is legal, but what is ethical. I don't consider your choice ethical. It may also not be legal, but I'm not really in a position to complain about that, nor am I a lawyer to know whether or not it is a true statement. I have put the question to a lawyer well-known in the OSS community, and will happily share the answer. In my second email, I went as far to state: "I'll grant that you *can* do that; I'm not sure that you *should* have done that, as it seems to violate the spirit of the Ruby community." I also indicated that as far as I know, the LGPL isn't really an option insofar as the codebase you have is still derivative of the original Ruby source -- because Ruby itself isn't under the LGPL. So please, Mr Petersen, do not try to claim that I reproached you for copyright violation -- merely the spirit of licences. Any reproach is entirely in your reading. I've asked questions. I have NOT accused, and I don't appreciate it when people suggest that I have. -austin -- Austin Ziegler, austin@halostatue.ca on 2002.09.09 at 01.52.55