From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2002-09-06T18:18:47+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby aesthetics

Hi,

In message "Re: Ruby aesthetics"
    on 02/09/06, Christian Szegedy <szegedy@nospam.or.uni-bonn.de> writes:

|This seems to be mainly a name problem.
|
|The names of the private functions could start with a
|special character followed by the (binarily) encoded id of the class
|(or mixed in module) they live in.
|
|Of course to accomplish this, each method must know to which
|class it belongs, but I think it's not so complicated.
|
|Do I miss some particular complication? I don't know the internals
|of Ruby so well.

Ruby classes/modules can be left unnamed.

							matz.