From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2002-09-06T16:28:47+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby aesthetics Hi, In message "Re: Ruby aesthetics" on 02/09/06, William Djaja Tjokroaminata writes: |Regarding the simplicity (minimalism), I think some people have |responded. Matz has given the reason why he did not adopt the |indentation-based syntax. I cannot recall Matz reasons on why he |personally did not try to adhere to the minimalism principle (such as |providing both "if" and "unless", "!" and "not", aliases, etc.) I think |the attractiveness of the C language stems from the fact that it is a |minimalist language, but yet so powerful. Why do you prefer minimalist way? I prefer flexibility, expressiveness, and succinctness to minimalism. I'm sure you don't have any problem with "unless" once you've told. matz.