From: W Kent Starr Date: 2002-09-05T07:07:19+09:00 Subject: Re: suggestions to the Ruby community On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 09:35, Peter Hickman wrote: > > Those who can do, > those who cant teach (or critisise - much of a muchness) > And those who can do neither administrate. This is the point I think the original poster was trying to make. Perhaps he and his colleagues can do "ri" and "google" (and even get a usable English copy from the Japanese) but the higher-ups who pay their salaries do not consider such puruits "productive". And these guys know it! So, the "easy" short-term solution is to -not- adopt Ruby when the check writers are content with the status quo, whatever that may be. The suits won't show any interest unless and until Ruby is "buzzy". Of course, for that to happen, those who -do- the work must elect Ruby over the alternatives. Perl was elected over C for sysadmin and CGI because it made the programmers' lives easier; no "suit" decreed the use of perl. In the days when C was fairly well-documented but still "involved" in terms of getting from a to b while perl was poorly documented but relatively sleek in the same terms, programmers turned increasingly to perl for day to day solutions.Today is somewhat different: perl -is- fairly well-documented and the on-the-surface differences between perl and Ruby are not that great, thus the hurdles to overcome when advocating a switch become, paradoxically, greater. As Larry Wall astutely observed, programmers are by nature lazy; if it is easier to stay with the tools they have, that is what they will do. If a dearthe of documentation is -perceived- as a disadvantage to Ruby, many working programmers will not switch. Regardless of whether a perception is accurate or not, the resulting reality (that is, the action taken) is the same. stibbs has pointed out what he believes to be a widespread perception that may be holding back the adoption of Ruby; to that extent, IMO it is an issue the community should address, whether in fact it is or not an issue within the community. Regards, Kent Starr > At one school I attended I wasn't allowed to do technical drawing > because I failed Latin! > >