From: "news.verizon.net" <vze4cdy5@...>
Date: 2002-08-28T09:42:57+09:00
Subject: Re: What Ruby needs.


"Kontra, Gergely" <kgergely@mlabdial.hit.bme.hu> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.21.0208271744580.30287-100000@mlabdial.hit.bme.hu...
> >
> >>I do not have any problem with item 1) on your wish list as long as I
don't
> >>loose the dynamic nature of  Ruby.
> >Both OCaml and Lisp are very dynamic. Some might argue that these are
> >the most dynamic languages around yet they are able to compile down to
> >very tight code.
>
> But OCaml is strongly typed.

And very much static, not dynamic...