From: Giuseppe Bilotta <bilotta78@...>
Date: 2002-08-27T18:21:43+09:00
Subject: Re: What New Language After Ruby?

Friedrich Dominicus wrote:
> I don't buy that. Especiall not the Java argument. Java is usually
> among the slowest languages and ther does exist a market for "native"
> Java compilers not for nothing.

Tow questions:

(1) is Ruby faster than Java? (I don't have special GUI requirements. 
Console-based programming.)

(2) how feasible is a Java to Ruby conversion?

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta

Axiom I of the Giuseppe Bilotta
theory of IT:
Anything is better than MS