From: Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn@...>
Date: 2002-08-27T01:11:27+09:00
Subject: Re: Distributed Object Container

Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> From: "Anders Bengtsson" <ndrsbngtssn@yahoo.se>
> > Compiled Ruby would remove one major benefit with Ruby, its dynamic
> > nature. However, interpreted Ruby within a JVM is already a reality,
> > although still in beta, see http://jruby.sourceforge.net/.
> > We hope to have some kind of Java bytecode generation in the future.
> 
> I hope to try JRuby in the not-too-distant-future.
> 
> Would Java bytecode generation preclude the dynamic nature?

Not necessarily. Ideally we can create both something for just-in-time
compilation as well as something that can emit Java class files.
We'll see what happens. :)

/Anders
-- 

A n d e r s  B e n g t s s o n  |  ndrsbngtssn@yahoo.se
Stockholm, Sweden               |

_____________________________________________________
F�lj VM p� n�ra h�ll p� Yahoo!s officielle VM-sajt www.yahoo.se/vm2002
H�ll dig ajour med nyheter och resultat, med vinnare och f�rlorare...